Papers Available

2 05 2014

I have just uploaded a series of papers to site on academia.edu. If you are signed into academia.edu, you will be able to download these free of charge.

Titles include:

The Pœnitentiale Theodori in theological perspective: soteriological aspects of confession according to Theodore of Tarsus

Another book for Jarrow’s library? Coincidences in exegesis between Bede and the Laterculus Malalianus

Preliminary enquiries into the place of the Laterculus Malalianus among the chronicles of late antiquity

A survey of the christology of Theodore of Tarsus in the Laterculus Malalianus

Christ’s Restoration of Humankind in the Laterculus Malalianus, 14

I hope you find these helpful.

 





Chronicles and Eschatology

21 04 2011

You are invited to read my recent article in the Journal for Late Antique Religion and Culture, entitled

PRELIMINARY ENQUIRIES INTO THE PLACE OF THE LATERCULUS MALALIANUS AMONG THE CHRONICLES OF LATE ANTIQUITY 

and to return to this site to comment.





Book on Theodore of Tarsus released

27 03 2010

Check it out by clicking on the title, below:

The Christology of Theodore of Tarsus





Address on Theodore of Tarsus, pt. 2

31 08 2007

As much time as we have spent looking at the details of Theodore’s biography, our real purpose here is to examine what it is he contributed to the formation of a distinctive church in this land. Before continuing, though, I would ask you to take note of my use of the word ‘contribution.’ I am not suggesting that, as inspiring a figure as I believe Theodore to be, he single-handedly established, created, or otherwise shaped the character of the British Church. It is more helpful, rather, that we think about Theodore’s contributions as something like ingredients added in baking. Whatever it is I will be proposing he put in, the result is a more appealing product than might have been the case without. Having said that, as you will shortly be shown, the ingredients Theodore did add were exotic indeed.

Read the rest of this entry »





Address on Theodore of Tarsus Pt. 1

31 08 2007

Lecture for the Wales & Marches Catholic History Society, Cardiff
9 June 2007

‘Theodore of Tarsus and the formation of a distinctive British Church, 668-690’

Before launching into today’s discussion of Theodore of Tarsus, let me begin by expressing my thanks to Daveth Frost for asking me on your behalf, and to all of you for having me speak this [morning] on a subject that is of immense importance to me. I trust you know what you have got yourselves in for, as I consider Theodore of Tarsus to be one of the most remarkable figures in the history of the British Church, but also one of the least represented. This means, of course, seeing as you are a captive audience, it is inevitable in the course of this talk that I should make up for all Theodore’s inadequate coverage, and give you as much information as I possibly can, without regard for the clock. So you better make yourselves comfortable.

Read the rest of this entry »





Address on Theodore of Tarsus

11 06 2007

Theodore of Tarsus got some well-deserved exposure this past Saturday, at a meeting of the Wales and Marches Catholic History Society.

I hope to post the text of the address on this site by the end of the week.





On The Authority of Tradition

2 06 2007

How the Church has historically determined doctrine is a poignant question, especially as it relates to such issues as Mary’s role in salvation, Papal authority, apostolic succession, and the nature of the Eucharist. This would equally apply to soteriological matters. When we ask the question, however, we soon discover that it is not enough to make singular and direct appeal to any one source, be it Scripture alone, the pious actions of the Church at a given point in history, or the witness of a solitary Father. Rather, as Jaroslav Pelikan makes clear, there must be a consensus among the Fathers of the Church, in concert with Sacred Scripture, by which we can be sure that doctrine is true.

The true and authentic consensus was that which reflected the mind of the Catholic and Universal Church […]. Patriarch Sophronius of Jerusalem, a contemporary of Maximus, summarized this idea of patristic consensus in a similar way: “An apostolic and ancient tradition has prevailed in the holy churches throughout the world, so that those who are inducted into the hierarchy sincerely refer everything they think and believe to those who have held the hierarchy before them. For…all their running would be in vain if an injustice were to be done to the faith in any respect” (Soph. Ep.syn. (PG 87:3149-52). Sophronius’s formula, “an apostolic and ancient tradition,” did not mean that everything “ancient” was therefore automatically “apostolic.” All the orthodox theologians knew that in some instances “antiquity means foolishness.” Even Irenaeus had erred in teaching the idea of the millenium. But while all that was ancient was not apostolic or orthodox, all that was orthodox had to have been apostolic and was therefore ancient. True doctrine, as Theodore of Studios was to assert, was “the excellence of the apostles, the foundation of the fathers, the keys of the dogmas, the standard of orthodoxy,” and anyone who contradicted it, even if he were an angel, was to be excommunicated and anathematized.

from J. Pelikan, The Spirit of Eastern Christendom, 600-1700 (The Christian Tradition series, Vol. 2), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1974, p. 22.